The CCME was created by Royal Decree on 21 December 2007 and constitutionalised in 2011. It is expected to assess public policy, issue opinions on the rights and interests of Moroccans abroad, preserve cultural ties and help mobilise the diaspora’s contribution to national development. This is a valuable function. A permanent body can build expertise on consular services, discrimination, identity, education, investment and cross-border law.
But expertise is not an electoral mandate.
Article 163 of the Constitution defines the CCME as an advisory body. Article 17 separately recognises Moroccans abroad as full citizens with the right to vote and stand for election, while leaving implementation from countries of residence to legislation. Consultation and elected representation are complementary constitutional tracks, not substitutes.
The 2007 decree required an ordinary plenary meeting every year, an annual activity report and a general analytical report every two years. In the public sections reviewed by MMNEWS, no recent, continuous and clearly indexed series of those documents could be located. That does not prove they were never produced. It does reveal a serious public-traceability problem for a state-funded constitutional institution.
The 2026 operating allocation has been reported at 49 million dirhams. The figure alone proves neither waste nor efficiency. It does justify full publication of accounts, opinions, attendance records, plenary decisions, performance indicators and government follow-up.
A transitional council that remained on display
The Royal Cabinet’s December 2007 communiqué stated that 37 members were appointed for a first transitional term of no more than four years; the future council was intended to have 50 members. The initial body was explicitly expected to help design a more representative successor.
In October 2026, however, the official website still presents Driss El Yazami as president and Abdellah Boussouf as secretary-general. Its working-group pages also display biographies that plainly belong to the original period. The public cannot easily determine who currently holds a deliberative seat, under which appointment, for what term, and through which selection criteria.
Both leaders have genuine diaspora credentials. El Yazami worked in France on immigration history and human rights, notably through Génériques and Migrance. Boussouf, a historian, was active in Muslim and community institutions in France and Belgium and helped advance the Strasbourg Grand Mosque project. Their experience is relevant. It is still not a mandate granted by diaspora voters.
What the founding membership reveals
The 2007 list brought together lawyers, academics, engineers, trade unionists, community organisers, religious figures, journalists, a doctor and businesspeople. Many had deep ties to Moroccan communities abroad.
Its numerical balance was nevertheless narrow:
- 31 of 37 members — about 84% — lived in Europe;
- 14 lived in France, nearly 38% of the total;
- nine were women, about 24%;
- Canada had two members, while the United States, Senegal, Algeria and the United Arab Emirates had one each;
- Latin America, Asia and large parts of Africa and the Gulf were absent from the founding snapshot.
This may have reflected migration patterns at the time. It cannot automatically describe the diaspora of 2026: new destinations, third- and fourth-generation citizens, scientists, start-up founders, students, retirees, precarious workers and transnational families.
Most importantly, the members were appointed, not elected by Moroccans abroad. They may have been representative of profiles; they were not representatives of voters.
A real contribution, but an impact that is hard to audit
The CCME is not an empty shell. It has commissioned studies, published books, held conferences, supported diaspora artists and intellectuals, explored religion and citizenship in Europe and developed digital resources. It has also voiced institutional criticism. In 2014, its secretary-general said the government and Parliament had not sought the Council’s opinion and supported a gradual path towards diaspora representation in both parliamentary chambers.
The problem is therefore not total inactivity. It is the gap between visible cultural and editorial activity and measurable constitutional performance. Without a complete public dashboard of statutory reports, formal opinions and their policy outcomes, output cannot be equated with impact.
The overhaul is now official policy
In August 2022, King Mohammed VI said that the framework serving Moroccans abroad remained insufficient and called for modernised institutions and governance. On 6 November 2024, he set out a sharper division of labour: a restructured CCME serving as an autonomous forum for reflection and proposals, representative of the diaspora’s different components; a new law and a newly installed Council; and a Mohammedia Foundation acting as the operational arm of public policy.
That architecture is sound in principle. The Council should analyse and advise. The Foundation should implement and coordinate. Parliament should legislate, vote the budget and hold the executive accountable.
As of 10 October 2026, the official pages reviewed by MMNEWS still foreground the founding framework and the leadership appointed in 2007, without a clearly dated new membership list. At least in terms of public visibility, the reform remains unfinished.
Direct representation would complement, not abolish, the CCME
MMNEWS’s editorial conclusion is clear: elected MPs for Moroccans abroad cannot be replaced by appointed advisers.
France combines a consultative assembly for citizens abroad with eleven directly elected MPs and twelve senators representing them. Its model has imperfections, including vast constituencies and uneven turnout. Yet it demonstrates that distance does not prevent voting, accountability or the coexistence of advisory expertise with parliamentary representation.
A credible Moroccan framework could include overseas constituencies periodically adjusted to registered populations; secure in-person, postal, advance or independently audited digital voting; transparent rolls and detailed results; a renewed and term-limited CCME; and mandatory disclosure of its opinions, reports, budget, attendance and conflicts of interest.
An elected diaspora MP could introduce legislation, amend tax or family-law provisions affecting cross-border households, question ministers about consular delays, scrutinise language and cultural programmes and vote on the budget. Then that MP would face the voters again.
That is what appointment, however well intentioned, cannot provide: the citizens’ power to choose, judge and replace.
The CCME can remain useful — even indispensable — as a transparent, plural and intellectually independent advisory institution. But it cannot democratically represent Moroccans abroad by declaration alone. The Constitution already recognises them as full citizens. The unfinished task is to turn that status into ballots, seats and voices in Parliament.
💬 التعليقات (0)
لا توجد تعليقات. كن أول من يعلق!
✏️ اكتب تعليقك